Industrial Decline in West Bengal (1967-2000): A Structural Narrative
In the decades following India’s independence, West Bengal was once an important industrial centre, benefiting from colonial-era manufacturing agglomerations, strategic port links, and proximity to raw materials. However, from the late 1960s onwards, the state’s industrial performance began to lag relative to other Indian states. By the end of the 20th century, its share of India’s manufacturing output and investment had substantially declined. This narrative explains why this decline occurred, drawing on structural factors, policy shifts, labour dynamics, and case examples of specific firms.
1. Pre-1965 Context: Legacy and Early Decline
Immediately after independence, Bengal faced significant structural disadvantages that its industrial base never fully overcame. The partition of India in 1947 severed access to jute-producing districts now in East Pakistan (later Bangladesh), leaving West Bengal’s large jute processing mills without stable raw material supply. This loss affected one of the state’s most important industrial sectors. Down To Earth
By the early 1960s, West Bengal’s manufacturing growth began slowing relative to other states such as Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. Central economic policies, including the freight equalisation policy of 1952, also undercut West Bengal’s locational advantages, making coal, steel, and other basic inputs effectively the same price anywhere in India. This eliminated the traditional comparative advantage that had supported heavy and engineering industry in the east. Wikipedia
2. 1967-1977: Rising Labour Unrest and Policy Stagnation
The period from 1967 to 1977 was marked by political turbulence and rising labour militancy. The late 1960s saw not just trade union agitation but also the Naxalite movement, a radical insurgency that heightened social conflict and contributed to greater industrial uncertainty. Frequent strikes, gheraos (worker sieges of management), and clashes between labour and management became common features of the industrial landscape in and around Kolkata and industrial districts such as Howrah and Hoogly. eCommons
Although labour unrest alone did not fully explain industrial decline—Maharashtra also experienced labour strife during this period—the severity and political roots of Bengal’s labour disputes increased perceived risks for private capital, domestic and foreign alike. Down To Earth
At the same time, central government industrial licensing policies did little to encourage fresh investment in West Bengal. Licences approved in the state were far fewer than those in states like Maharashtra, constraining new factory setup even before the broader economic slowdown of the 1970s. Down To Earth
Industrialists faced an environment where capital formation slowed, work stoppages increased, and the relative performance of the state worsened. By the mid-1970s, West Bengal was already producing a smaller proportion of India’s overall manufacturing output than states experiencing stronger industrial growth. Down To Earth
3. 1977-1989: Left Front Rule and Structural Shifts
The Left Front, led by the Communist Party of India (Marxist), came to power in 1977 and ruled the state for over three decades. Its early industrial policy focused on strengthening small and cottage industries, redistributing industrial assets, and curbing the dominance of large private and multinational firms. While political objectives were clear, the effect on large-scale industry was negative.
The Left Front government inherited an already slowing industrial economy. Between 1977 and the late 1980s, West Bengal’s share of organised industrial output continued to shrink. Industrial production costs in the state were higher than in competitors like Gujarat and Maharashtra, partly because of rigid labour practices, administrative costs, and infrastructure bottlenecks. Wikipedia
This period also saw several key firms struggle under these conditions:
-
Hindustan Motors: At its peak, the engineering firm at Uttarpara was a major employer and symbol of industrial prowess. In the mid-1990s, competition from more efficient automobile producers combined with high labour costs and union resistance to restructuring made the plant less competitive. When the company tried to shed workforce to cut costs, trade unions resisted strongly, with support from political actors, exacerbating business stress. Rediff
-
Kesoram Cotton Mills: Historically significant in textiles, the firm faced managerial challenges and industry headwinds. Like many large firms in the state, both internal inefficiencies and external constraints contributed to its eventual closure. Wikipedia
-
Metal Box and Guest Keen Williams (GKW): Engineering firms that had been part of Kolkata’s industrial landscape saw employment contraction and closure during the 1980s as productivity lagged and market competition intensified. Wikipedia
The Left Front’s industrial strategy also reflected hostility or skepticism toward big business, seeing large capital as antithetical to socialist development goals. This stance, combined with labour politics, discouraged new private investment. While there were pockets of small-scale entrepreneurial activity, these did not compensate for the loss of large-scale manufacturing. Down To Earth
4. 1991-2000: Liberalisation and Continued Challenges
India’s national economic liberalisation in 1991 reduced license controls and opened the economy. West Bengal’s state government initially opposed many central reform policies, reflecting ideological resistance. When it eventually revised its industrial policy in 1994 to attract investment, the effects were muted. Although the state welcomed foreign capital and eased certain restrictions, the momentum of decline was already entrenched. Down To Earth
Even as national markets opened, West Bengal’s share of manufacturing in India continued to fall. By the late 1990s, the state’s share of industrial output had dropped significantly from its earlier positions in the post-independence period. Down To Earth
Traditional industries like jute also continued their structural contraction. The global shift in packaging materials toward synthetics, combined with the earlier disruption of raw jute supply after partition and lack of export diversification, meant that once-dominant jute mills along the Hooghly River operated in decline or closed. dusp.mit.edu
During the 1990s, the labour environment remained a constraint. While outright militant disruptions declined compared to the earlier decades, high wage costs, rigid labour laws, and adversarial union relationships continued to discourage capital expenditure in heavy industry relative to other Indian states where labour reforms and more flexible practices were introduced. Wikipedia
5. Structural Outcomes by 2000
By the end of the 20th century:
-
West Bengal’s contribution to India’s industrial output had fallen significantly compared to the early post-independence decades. Down To Earth
-
Large manufacturing firms that once anchored the state’s economy had either closed or relocated significant operations elsewhere. Rediff
-
The state saw a relative shift toward small-scale industries, informal manufacturing, and services, while heavy industry lost ground. Wikipedia
The combination of labour and political factors, state and central policies, infrastructure and cost disadvantages, and firm-level management failures created a cumulative dynamic that shifted private capital toward more competitive environments in states like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu. Down To Earth+1
Conclusion
The industrial decline of West Bengal from 1967 to 2000 was neither the result of a single event nor attributable solely to militant unions or state government policy. Rather, it was the outcome of a complex interaction of historical disadvantages (such as the partition impact on jute), central policies that neutralised locational advantages, political economy choices that discouraged large private investment, persistent labour rigidity, and management failures within firms. By the turn of the century, West Bengal’s industrial character had shifted from heavy manufacturing toward small-scale and informal sectors, marking a profound structural transformation in the Indian economic landscape.
Comments