Author: J. Bradford DeLong
What the Book Is About (Core Thesis)
The book argues that 1870–2010 was humanity’s most transformative economic era — the period when technological progress, industrialization, and organizational innovation dramatically increased global living standards.
But:
We got the wealth of utopia, not the social stability.
Economic growth accelerated — political and social institutions did not keep pace.
Central Argument Structure
1️⃣ The Inflection Point: ~1870
Around 1870:
-
Second Industrial Revolution
-
Electricity, internal combustion engine
-
Modern corporations
-
Scientific R&D becomes systematic
Productivity growth compounds.
2️⃣ 1870–1945: Chaos and Catastrophe
Despite rapid growth:
-
World War I
-
Great Depression
-
World War II
-
Fascism & totalitarianism
Technology + mass politics created instability.
3️⃣ 1945–1973: The “Social Democratic Compromise”
Post-war institutions stabilized capitalism:
-
Welfare state
-
Strong labor bargaining
-
Managed capitalism
-
Bretton Woods system
This was the most balanced period between growth and equality.
4️⃣ 1973–2010: Neoliberal Shift
-
Deregulation
-
Financialization
-
Globalization
-
Rising inequality
Growth continued, but distribution skewed heavily upward.
Key Concepts to Understand While Reading
Creative Destruction
Borrowed from Joseph Schumpeter
Innovation disrupts old industries faster than societies can adjust.
Political Economy Failure
Markets created wealth.
Politics failed to distribute and stabilize it.
Productivity vs Happiness
GDP rose dramatically.
Social cohesion did not.
If You Study This as an Investor (relevant to you)
Given your frequent market and capital growth questions, here’s the strategic angle:
-
The book explains why U.S. equities dominated post-1970
-
Why inequality supports asset price inflation
-
Why financialization benefited capital holders disproportionately
-
Why emerging markets (India, China) are replicating parts of this arc
It provides macro-historical context for:
-
Why S&P 500 outperformed
-
Why UK stagnated
-
Why Japan stalled post-1990
-
Why China’s political structure matters for markets
Strengths of the Book
-
Integrates economics + politics + sociology
-
Long-run perspective
-
Strong narrative of institutional lag
Limitations / Critiques
-
Western-centric focus
-
Underplays cultural variables
-
Optimistic bias toward technocratic solutions
How to Read It Efficiently
If time-constrained:
-
Read Introduction carefully.
-
Focus on chapters covering:
-
1870–1914 expansion
-
1945–1973 settlement
-
Post-1973 neoliberal era
-
-
Skim detailed political episodes.
Core Takeaway
From 1870 onward, humanity created enough productive capacity for material abundance.
But governance, identity politics, and institutional design never fully caught up.
We “slouched” toward utopia — we didn’t arrive.
Comments